Self-Assessment / Global Trade Readiness

What Would Your Trade Compliance Program Actually Score?

A ten-minute gut check on the systems most defense exporters assume are solid, covering classification, licensing, and compliance infrastructure. Answer honestly, tally your score, and see exactly where you stand.

Access The Scorecard

$2B+

In penalties mitigated

$3B+

In export markets opened

43+

Direct relationships with U.S. government offices

150+ years

DTS staff experience

The Pattern Behind Most Compliance Gaps

Most trade compliance programs are built piece by piece. A screening process gets added. A classification step is documented. A training update arrives the moment someone flags a gap. Each piece can hold up fine on its own. What usually doesn't hold up is the space between them, where classification, licensing, and screening are supposed to connect and don't.

That gap matters more now than it used to. DDTC enforcement has picked up. Consent agreements are becoming more common. In the GE Aerospace consent agreement alone, 103 of the 116 charges traced back to authorization mismanagement, the kind of operational exposure that builds quietly inside trade compliance programs. And the bar keeps moving. Export control reform keeps shifting what an international trade compliance program is expected to look like.

This assessment comes from what DTS practitioners have seen across dozens of mid-market exporters, the areas where programs commonly break down, and the ones most companies never think to check until something forces the question.

What’s inside

What You're Actually Being Scored On

This assessment moves through five specific areas where international defense programs typically break down.

  • Business structure and ownership exposure
  • Authorization and registration status
  • Trade compliance infrastructure and training
  • Day-to-day execution and logistics
  • Controlled technology and technical data

Who it’s for

Built for companies navigating international defense business

  • Defense exporters managing ITAR-controlled articles, technical data, or defense services
  • Companies pursuing international sales through Foreign Military Sales (FMS) or Direct Commercial Sales (DCS) channels, unsure whether their compliance infrastructure is ready
  • Global trade compliance, export compliance, and legal teams who want to pressure-test their own programs
  • Business development (BD) and sales leaders tired of deals stalling on compliance gaps they didn't see coming
  • Mid-market companies ($50M–$500M) that have outgrown ad hoc compliance but haven't built the infrastructure yet
Global map with international trade connections

Deals stall over gaps like these. Find yours in 10 minutes.

These aren't academic questions. DTS practitioners have spent years diagnosing these exact patterns across mid-market defense programs.

Get your global trade readiness score

Disclaimer: Prepared by Defense Trade Solutions for client education purposes. This assessment does not constitute legal advice.

We use cookies to improve your experience. Please accept or manage your preferences.