In today’s defense contracting landscape, International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) compliance isn’t just a box to check—it’s a critical factor in winning contracts, avoiding costly delays, and maintaining a competitive edge in global markets.
For companies bidding on Advisory & Assistance Services (A&AS), Systems Engineering & Technical Assistance (SETA), Contractor Logistics Support (CLS), Foreign Military Sales (FMS), and Maintenance, Repair & Overhaul (MRO) contracts, ITAR plays a central role. These contracts often involve technical data sharing, defense services to foreign governments or companies, export of hardware, and the movement of personnel overseas—all of which trigger ITAR requirements.
Yet, many defense contractors still treat ITAR as an overhead afterthought in their business development, proposal, and program execution processes. The result? Proposal disqualifications, compliance failures, and lost revenue.
Why ITAR Matters in DoD Proposals
ITAR is designed to control the export of defense-related technology, ensuring U.S. military superiority and preventing unauthorized access to sensitive capabilities. For DoD contractors, any contract involving defense articles, services, or technical data—even if all work is performed within the United States—must comply with ITAR requirements.
What many companies overlook is that ITAR compliance begins long before a contract is awarded. It starts at the proposal stage, influencing how companies structure pricing, manage supply chains and handle technical data exchanges. Failing to address ITAR early in the process can create serious obstacles down the line. Non-compliance with ITAR clauses in RFPs can lead to proposal rejection, eliminating opportunities before they even materialize. If a contract is awarded without proper ITAR planning, companies often face delays in execution due to unanticipated export approvals and licensing hurdles. These delays can drive up costs, leading to budget overruns and financial strain. In the worst cases, ITAR violations can result in severe penalties, including fines, contract terminations, and long-term reputational damage.
Conversely, companies that take a proactive approach to ITAR can gain a competitive edge. By integrating ITAR considerations into their DoD bids from the outset, they position themselves as trusted, export-ready partners for international defense programs. This strategic advantage not only reduces compliance risks but also enhances their ability to secure contracts and expand into global markets.
The Hidden Risks and Opportunities of ITAR
Most contractors see ITAR as a regulatory burden, but forward-thinking companies recognize it as a business opportunity. Those who fail to address ITAR proactively expose themselves to significant risks that can hinder contract execution and profitability.
One major risk is compliance pitfalls, where improper handling of ITAR-controlled data can lead to legal violations, penalties, and even contract termination. Export delays are another common issue—failing to anticipate licensing requirements can bring operations to a halt, delaying deliveries and frustrating customers. Additionally, many companies face unrecoverable costs because they fail to account for ITAR-related compliance expenses in their contract pricing, absorbing costs that could have been charged to the government.
However, mastering ITAR offers several strategic advantages. A well-structured ITAR program provides competitive differentiation, making companies more attractive to prime contractors, foreign partners, and DoD customers who value compliance-ready suppliers. It also opens the door to global market expansion, as ITAR-compliant companies are better positioned to secure Foreign Military Sales (FMS) and Direct Commercial Sales (DCS) contracts. Perhaps most importantly, companies that proactively manage ITAR can recover compliance costs by structuring contracts in a way that allows them to legally charge the U.S. Government for ITAR-related work, turning what was once a regulatory burden into billable services.
Charging the Government for ITAR Compliance
One of the biggest mistakes contractors make is absorbing the costs of ITAR compliance instead of recovering them through their contracts. Many companies fail to realize that ITAR-related work—such as export licensing, compliance training, technical data management, and regulatory reporting—can be included in proposal pricing when structured correctly. By treating these expenses as part of the overall contract strategy, businesses can avoid unnecessary financial strain while ensuring full compliance with regulatory requirements.
To maximize cost recovery, contractors must first identify ITAR-related costs that qualify for reimbursement. This includes understanding which compliance activities can be categorized as allowable expenses under the contract. Once identified, companies should differentiate between direct and indirect costs, ensuring they are allocated appropriately within the pricing structure. A well-structured cost recovery approach also requires justifying ITAR expenses in contract negotiations, demonstrating their necessity to the U.S. Government, and ensuring they are factored into the overall contract value.
By integrating ITAR costs into contracts, companies can offset compliance expenses and increase profitability—without placing unnecessary burdens on internal budgets. A proactive approach to cost recovery not only strengthens financial performance but also ensures that ITAR compliance remains a sustainable and integral part of the business’s defense contracting strategy.
Best Practices for ITAR-Protected Proposals
Winning ITAR-sensitive DoD contracts requires more than just compliance—it requires a strategy. Contractors must integrate ITAR considerations into proposal development, supply chain management, and contract execution to ensure smooth operations and avoid costly disruptions. Simply reacting to ITAR requirements after a contract is awarded can lead to delays, compliance risks, and missed opportunities for cost recovery.
A proactive approach starts with identifying ITAR-controlled data early in the proposal process and ensuring it is properly marked to prevent mishandling. Managing subcontractors and suppliers is equally critical, as their compliance with ITAR requirements directly impacts the prime contractor’s ability to fulfill contract requirements. Companies should also obtain export licenses and Technical Assistance Agreements (TAAs) in advance rather than scrambling to secure them post-award, which can delay program execution.
Equipping personnel with the right knowledge is another essential component of an effective ITAR strategy. Training employees on ITAR handling helps prevent accidental violations that could result in fines, contract penalties, or reputational damage. Additionally, engaging ITAR experts early in the bid process ensures compliance measures are built into the contract from the outset, reducing risks and positioning the company for long-term success.
Want to Learn More?
As an approved DoD subcontractor for ITAR compliance, DTS helps companies navigate these challenges by ensuring regulatory requirements are met, ITAR-related costs are recovered, and businesses are positioned as trusted, export-ready partners within the defense industry.
Comments